Cosmos Cosmos Hub 2

Increase Max Validator Set Size to 125

Passed
Proposal passes.
YES
94.77%
115.845M ATOM
ABSTAIN
0.12%
143,480.1 ATOM
NO
5.11%
6.245M ATOM
NO (VETO)
0%
0 ATOM
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION

Read here, or on ipfs.ink

This proposal supercedes proposal number 9, which contains conflicting numbers in the title and body.

In the Cosmos Hub, the total number of active validators is currently capped at 100, ordered by total delegated Atoms. This number was originally proposed in the Cosmos whitepaper section titled [Limitations on the Number of Validators](github.com 4). This number was chosen as a relatively conservative estimate, as at the time of writing, it was unclear how many widely distributed nodes Tendermint consensus could scale to over the public internet.

However, since then, we have seen empirically through the running of the Game of Stakes incentivized testnet that Tendermint Core with Gaia state machine can operate with over 180 validators at reasonable average block times of <7 seconds. The Game of Stakes results empirically show that adding validators should not delay consensus at small block sizes. At large block sizes, the time it takes for the block to gossip to all validators may increase depending on the newfound network topology. However we view this as unlikely, and if it did become a problem, it could later be solved by known improvements at the p2p layer. The other tradeoff to increasing the number of validators is that the size of commits becomes ~25% larger due to more precommits being included, increasing the network and storage costs for nodes. This can also be resolved in the future with the integration of aggregate signatures. At the time of submission of this proposal, the minimum delegation to become a top 100 validator is 30,600 Atoms, a fairly high barrier to entry for new validators looking to enter the active validator set.

In the Cosmos whitepaper, it states that the number of validators on the Hub will increase at a rate of 13% a year until it hits a cap of 300 validators. We propose scrapping this mechanism and instead increasing the max validators to 125 validators in the next chain upgrade with no further planned increases. Future increases to the validator set size will be originated through governance.

VOTES
Yes cosmos1jwgdw55ssd3zdwfgm20sh6pc5kmwzfqdg84m4g
Yes Cosmos-Validator.com
Yes cosmos1qk93t4j0yyzgqgt6k5qf8deh8fq6smpn3ntu3x
Yes validator.network | Security first. Highly available.
Yes cosmos1j3nwzk4kaqzfaghmczu8dmta9qplgu7sy2379l
Yes Sentinel
Yes cosmos1vzj0lluc43k64gagvy9wsygh33dk84h07a3rsu
Yes cosmos148045k6x9f4wmmg84zqumckk5rs34rqalfe387
Yes noma
Yes ATEAM
Yes cosmos17pz7rlzlgsne9luslvxpchn5m3p5fgrqefg08x
Yes Certus One
Yes cosmos1pm306gekffejtpe43yeaqe4s2fvdyk7gzjq5e7
Yes cosmos1hy2h208h9g77wcs60wn9nch3f9wkrvdl0fptye
Yes cosmos1j7gfv7m72yvky7h4xquhqt9xguvk7auz30k3uf
No P2P.ORG - P2P Validator
Yes 🌐 KysenPool.io
Yes cosmos16jg9hvs55jvzdys7py94y4ydlzylakmqjnrwjk
Yes Sanka Network
Yes Cosmos Suisse
Yes Simply VC
Yes cosmos1akhswynqs07zj5p2k25r6s4ur45qyjnr30wt59
Yes cosmos1klu64ju8ltv8r0c935ctedcwewj6fyv4c9vjws
Yes StakeWith.Us
Yes Cosmostation
Yes 真本聪&IOSG
Yes cosmos1e0a2zce470wzxmyptr248yuut8enyne823kcux
Yes Forbole
Yes Umbrella ☔
Yes CoinoneNode
Yes lunamint
Yes cosmos1pz6yu5vdxfzw85cn6d7rp52me4lu8khx7lpkzd
Yes Compass
No Staked
Yes jackzampolin
Yes cosmos1pcr3ucd4uyp8n90cyjlrwkuzuy5rzglttu94e5
Yes Chorus One
Yes atom.bi23.com
Yes 01node.com
Yes cosmos1qht2a277khy9caeasclmaj42dumpp48wtpnnmq
Yes SparkPool
Yes DappPub
Yes B-Harvest
Yes 🐠stake.fish | bitfish
No stake.zone
Yes cosmos1e9jlmhjnhv0z5wj64gz0dwn6q523xyxexne9dq
Yes cosmos1qc60ztmn89hzn9w8zxd77m7lcpygcjdczkrd6n
Yes cosmos105l5r3rjtynn7lg362r2m9hkpfvmgmjt7nvq9h
Yes Ping
Yes Staking Fund: the Never Jailed Crew
Yes DragonStake
Yes Firmamint
Abstain cosmos14tagw85xqm5jydmqpts2v2leq64stpqgqpqfae
Yes 2nd only to Certus One in GoS: in3s.com
Yes Skystar Capital
Yes Figment Networks
Yes cosmos16q5glqkpufrm57fudvsm54zcmu6dxszg26j2au
Yes Cosmoon
Yes IØN
Yes Cryptium Labs
Yes ColmenaSvQ🐝
Yes cosmos1d8mq46wt2yxsgwrmh6hhfgycl0537w8gtm8xqw
Yes cosmos1mrkn3uug9dm32hyp9tcxs5dmmuspt7nezrdmhz
Yes cosmos1lugpap3vtd7ncg8hf4zkreqtecgfv5a0kgeeux
Yes cosmos16e0d66nc9qdp3spyrkkjqersakkve3g6amu6fq
Yes cosmos1znsdduyexlql4944rtgtugca5kf0gdt5mwmdhf
Yes Delega Networks♾
Yes Bity.com
Yes WeStaking
Yes cosmos1qwfuk7ppxq5evf2d6pmpra7t0xpsrtfprms90c
Yes cosmos1k85m3qrzfxkw29v6thn2dp7r6mnw8trp08xknd
Yes cosmos1qkl9p683rqhs7nntvz8h4pjmrlctnwdelr9mzx
Yes cosmos15njsc4lap2h94xum2xatf9xmex4088u9jcmpv9
Yes Dominator
No kochacolaj
Yes SecThor42 | Vali the Thor
Yes KalpaTech
Yes NewRoad.Capital
Yes commercio.network
Yes POS Bakerz
Yes Genesis Lab
Abstain cosmos12ealu07v9647r2gjv2u93hk2h2vvcwj9wh7wfk
Yes Easy 2 Stake
Yes Sikka
Yes cosmos14xgdfdnpjtulj6p7rkc75ekxqjq8hc5c7x6hpd
Yes Everstake
Yes melea
Yes ChainLayer
Yes kytzu
Yes syncnode
Info #10
2019-07-01 at 14:09 UTC
69%
122M of 177M ATOM have voted.
Tallying Procedure
40%
50%
33.4%
0.0